Legal Opinion
Kimbrough v. National Protective Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1930PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
We find the statement made by appellant is a fair presentation and adopt it as follows:
"This suit is based upon an accident insurance policy providing for an indemnity of $1,200 for the loss of the sight of both eyes. A verdict and judgment in favor or plaintiff for $1,209.95 was entered. The motion for new trial filed by defendant was sustained upon the ground that the court erred in refusing an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence. Plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal from the order setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial.
"The insuring clause in policy upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Security Mutual Life Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Continental Casualty Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- LaForce v. Williams City Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Goerss v. the Indemnity Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Varble Ex Rel. Varble v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- McClintock v. Skelly Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
- State ex rel. Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Ass'n v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Daly v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
- Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.