Legal Opinion

Kimbrough v. National Protective Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1930PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We find the statement made by appellant is a fair presentation and adopt it as follows:

"This suit is based upon an accident insurance policy providing for an indemnity of $1,200 for the loss of the sight of both eyes. A verdict and judgment in favor or plaintiff for $1,209.95 was entered. The motion for new trial filed by defendant was sustained upon the ground that the court erred in refusing an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence. Plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal from the order setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial.
"The insuring clause in policy upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. Security Mutual Life Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. LaForce v. Williams City Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Goerss v. the Indemnity Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Varble Ex Rel. Varble v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. McClintock v. Skelly Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. State ex rel. Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Ass'n v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Daly v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API