Legal Opinion

United States v. Brodie

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 19, 2004No. CRIM. 02-0190ESHPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Defendants face criminal charges arising from their alleged participation in schemes to defraud various financial institutions by submitting fraudulent documents in order to receive inflated mortgage proceeds. According to the indictment, while there are differences between the two conspiracies charged, the basic modus operandi is the same. In the case of all properties, the property was flipped, ie., purchased and resold on the same day. In particular, a dilapidated property was initially bought by a buyer who did no repairs to the property, but then…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. ClarkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. United States v. PalfreyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. United States v. Sanford Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. United States v. BazezewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API