Legal Opinion

Shahan v. Bayer Vehicle Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

'Appeal [rom Grinnell Superior Court. — P. G. Norris, Judge. Action to recover the amount alleged to be due for personal services. General denial on the part of the defendants. A special plea of accord and satisfaction. Judgment for the defendants in the court below, based on the finding of accord and satisfaction. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, O. J.

In the first count of plaintiff’s petition, he seeks to recover for services rendered under a written contract entered into on or about the 10th day of April, 191-1. This written contract provides that the defendants pay the plaintiff the sum of $65 per month for 10 approved sales of certain buggies manufactured by defendants, and that proportion for less, and, in either event, the actual expenses of the plaintiff while on the road. Further, the plaintiff was to receive $7.50 for each approved sale over 10. Under this contract, plaintiff worked in the state of Texas between April…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keck v. Hotel Owners Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Sparks v. Spaulding Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Johnston v. BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frazier v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Holm v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Olson v. ShulerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Olson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. v. Register & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API