Legal Opinion

Chase v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1998No. 02S01-9703-CV-00019PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLDER, Justice.

This ease involves a tort action against the defendant, City of Memphis, arising out of a woman’s death when she was mauled by two pit bull dogs. The Court of Appeals held that the City was immune under the Governmental Tort Liability Act (“GTLA”) but removed the immunity pursuant to the common law special duty exception to the public duty doctrine. The issues with which we are now confronted are whether: (1) the City animal shelter’s failure to follow-up on an order requiring the owner of the dangerous dogs to enroll his dogs in obedience school was im mune under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ezell v. CockrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bowers by Bowers v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Limbaugh v. Coffee Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Timmy Mosier v. Joseph EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Matthews v. Pickett CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Brown v. Hamilton CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API