Legal Opinion

In re Hackney

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 2001No. 99-BG-1490PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On June 25, 1999, respondent James Y. Hackney was convicted in federal court of four counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The indictment indicates that respondent knowingly defrauded investors by urging them to invest in certain ventures in South Africa, collecting monies for that purpose, and then spending the monies on himself rather than investing them.

On December 13,1999, this court temporarily suspended respondent pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 10(c). We directed the Board on Professional Responsibility to institute a formal proceeding to determine the nature of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re FerberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In re Kuang Hsung J. ChuangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re TezakDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API