Legal Opinion

Jamal Nance v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2017No. 2016 SC 000027Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

lMPORTANT NOT|CE NOT TO BE PUBL|SHED OP|N|ON TH|S OP|N|ON lS DES|GNATED ”NOT TO BE PUBL|SHED.” PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF C|VlL PROCEDURE PROMULGATED BY THE SUPREME COURT, CR 76.28(4)(€), TH|S OP|N|ON lS NOT TO BE PUBL|SHED AND SHALL NOT BE C|TED OR USED AS BlND|NG PRECEDENT IN ANY OTHER CASE lN ANY_COURT OF TH|S STATE; HOWEVER, UNPUBL|SHED KENTUCKY APPELLATE DEC|S|ONS, RENDERED AFTER .lANUARY 1, 2003, MAY BE C|TED FOR CONS|DERAT|ON BY THE COURT lF THERE lS NO PUBL|SHED OP|N|ON THAT WOULD ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE lSSUE BEFORE THE COURT. OP|N|ONS C|TED FOR CONSIDERAT|ON BY THE COURT SHALL BE SET…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Berrier v. BizerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Tackett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API