Legal Opinion
Fry v. Hough (In Re Hough)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
Decided December 18, 1998No. 19-40200PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JIM D. PAPPAS, Chief Judge.
Background and Facts.
This action presents an issue of first impression in this District. The parties submit, and the Court agrees, that no issues of mate rial fact remain for trial, and that the question presented in purely one of law involving the interpretation of a relatively new provision of the Bankruptcy Code.
Defendant Barbara Hough filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition with this Court on April 8, 1998. Plaintiffs Robert and Elizabeth Fry (d/b/a Gem Physical Therapy Clinic) and Chip Sands are included among her creditors. It seems that in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hough v. Fry (In Re Hough)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In re DickersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2014
- Benjumen v. AES/Charter Bank (In Re Benjumen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Spitz v. Tepfer (In Re Tepfer)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Ada County Prosecuting Attorney's Office v. Searcy (In Re SEARCY)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.