Louis J. Gumpert v. The Bon Ami Company

The majority opinion states that the “jury’s verdict of $10,416.65, which is the difference between what Gumpert had received and $25,000, was inconsistent with the proof of either party.” Although the jury’s verdict was inconsistent with the full contention of each par*740ty, considered separately; it is not without substantial support when the evidence of both sides is considered as a whole.1 .

The majority opinion also states that in view of the jury’s verdict, the indication is that the “jury must have found either that a one-year contract was entered into on June 2 or that Rosenberg had the…