Legal Opinion

Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 2007PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Kirby Electric, Inc. (Kirby) appeals from an order granting the Hempfield Township Municipal Authority’s (the Authority) motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Kirby contends that the trial court committed legal error when it determined that the parties’ agreement was a settlement agreement and refused to admit documents under the parol evidence rule. Additionally, Kirby asserts that the trial court erred in finding that the settlement amount was established, paid, and received. We' find no merit in any of Kirby’s contentions. Accordingly, we affirm the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. McKennaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Step Plan Services, Inc. v. KoreskoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Mastroni-Mucker v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Schmidt v. Boardman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Miller v. PooleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API