People v. Fultz
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
554 N.W.2d 725 (1996)
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph Dale FULTZ, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 103440. COA No. 165271.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 12, 1996.
This matter having come on to be heard by leave granted and oral argument having been heard, on order of the Court, we REVERSE the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the Oakland County Probate Court. For the reasons stated by the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeals, we find the probate court abused its discretion in denying the prosecutor's motion to waive jurisdiction to the circuit court. We REMAND…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. TalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. SchumacherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. DunbarMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Shane B.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
- King v. WinnDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- People of Michigan v. William Randolph KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Russell N. Theis, plaintiff/counterclaim v. Shawn Kalvelage, defendant/counterclaimCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.