Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2015No. Case No. 20130326PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURRANT,

opinion of the Court:

Introduction

1 1 We are asked to review a magistrate's decision, at the preliminary hearing stage, to dismiss charges of rape and child sexual abuse. Under Utah's liberal bindover standard, a magistrate must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution. This means that when reasonable inferences from the evidence cut both for and against the state's case, the magistrate lacks discretion to choose between them and must leave such a determination to the fact-finder at trial, But a magistrate may disregard any testimony that is so…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. VirginUtah Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. MaloUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. PrisbreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API