Legal Opinion
East Side Trust & Savings Bank v. McGinnis
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Bay; Houghton, J. Assumpsit by the East Side Trust & Savings Bank against Francis F. McGinnis for the amount of a promissory note. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The plaintiff is a loan and trust company, located at Hammond, Ind., organized under an act of the general assembly of the State of Indiana (Laws 1893, chap. 161), entitled.
“An act to authorize the organization and incorporation of loan and trust and safe deposit companies, and defining their powers, rights and duties,” etc.
The declaration is upon the common counts in assumpsit, to which was attached, under the usual notice, a copy of a promissory note made by the defendant, reading as follows:
“$500.00. Hammond, Ind.; Dec. 24,1913.
“Nine months after date, I promise to pay to the order of East…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coddington v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Macomb v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Hubbard v. FreibergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Lovell v. WillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Graham v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Klimmer v. KlimmerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975