Legal Opinion

Brumage v. Blubaugh

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1993No. [No. 93, October Term, 1953.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the amount of $430.00 and costs, for damages to an automobile entered on a verdict by a jury.

Appellant, Henry Brumage, contends that the trial judge was in error in overruling his motion for a directed verdict and for a judgment non obstante verdicto because there was no evidence establishing primary negligence on the part of the appellant. We will therefore recite the evidence in a light most favorable to the appellee, James A. Blubaugh.

The appellee, who was traveling from Westemport, Maryland, to Barton, testified as follows: He had driven his automobile…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Potts v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Marshall v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Gordon v. OpaleckyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. State, Use of CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Meinen v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. AldersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Matthews v. State ex rel. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API