Brumage v. Blubaugh
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in the amount of $430.00 and costs, for damages to an automobile entered on a verdict by a jury.
Appellant, Henry Brumage, contends that the trial judge was in error in overruling his motion for a directed verdict and for a judgment non obstante verdicto because there was no evidence establishing primary negligence on the part of the appellant. We will therefore recite the evidence in a light most favorable to the appellee, James A. Blubaugh.
The appellee, who was traveling from Westemport, Maryland, to Barton, testified as follows: He had driven his automobile…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Potts v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Marshall v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Gordon v. OpaleckyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wiggins v. State, Use of CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Meinen v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. AldersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Matthews v. State ex rel. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962