Legal Opinion

Reid-Murdock & Co. v. Model Meat & Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 10, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Turner, Commissioner—

Dismissing the appeal as to appellants, Indian Refining Company and H. J. Heinz Company, and granting appeal and reversing as to appellants, Reid-Murdock & Co., and the Power Grocery Company.

On and prior to July 24, 1916, appellees, Taylor Hurst, S. F. Hughes and J. W. Hon, were partners in a meat and grocery business and doing the same under the firm name of Model Meat and Grocery Company. On that day they sold out the business to Hurst Hampton, a nephew of Taylor Hurst.

Young Hampton continued to operate the business thereafter, as he says, under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Covington Bro's. & Co. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Mitchum v. Bank of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
  3. Gaar v. HugginsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  4. Lieb & Son v. CraddockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Middleton v. FrancesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Central Wholesale Co. v. YadenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Hammonds v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Watkins v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API