Dysart v. Dysart

*121MEMORANDUM OPINION

(December 17,2002)

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 in which Defendant claims that the prenuptial agreement signed by both parties should control all matters encompassed therein. This Court has found no relevant case law concerning the propriety of prenuptial agreements in this jurisdiction. Nevertheless, this Court concludes that the prenuptial agreement is valid with, respect to the matters that it addresses; and, upon that limited basis, partial summary judgment shall be…