Jerome White v. Salvador A. Godinez
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This matter is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court has directed that we reevaluate our decision in light of its holding in O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 1728, 144 L.Ed.2d 1 (1999). See Godinez v. White, 526 U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 2335, 144 L.Ed.2d 233 (1999).
In Boerckel, the Supreme Court held that failure to pursue a discretionary appeal to the highest court of the state constitutes a procedural default that bars resort to federal habeas corpus relief. Although Boerckel involved a criminal matter on direct appeal, we do not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Levi Strauss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jerome White v. Salvador A. GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Godinez v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pruitt v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Kevin Rittenhouse v. John C. BattlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Ramiro Hernandez v. Roger D. Cowan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Jerome White v. Salvador A. GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Killingsworth v. BENSKODistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.