Legal Opinion

Jerome White v. Salvador A. Godinez

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 29, 1999No. 96-3187PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court has directed that we reevaluate our decision in light of its holding in O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 1728, 144 L.Ed.2d 1 (1999). See Godinez v. White, 526 U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 2335, 144 L.Ed.2d 233 (1999).

In Boerckel, the Supreme Court held that failure to pursue a discretionary appeal to the highest court of the state constitutes a procedural default that bars resort to federal habeas corpus relief. Although Boerckel involved a criminal matter on direct appeal, we do not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. Levi Strauss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Jerome White v. Salvador A. GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Godinez v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Kevin Rittenhouse v. John C. BattlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Ramiro Hernandez v. Roger D. Cowan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Jerome White v. Salvador A. GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Killingsworth v. BENSKODistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API