Legal Opinion
United States v. Tsai
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 28, 1919No. 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 41937. [Oral argument Jan. 17, 1919, by Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The merchandise under consideration in this case consists of certain porcelain vases and earthenware and stone articles imported *43from China. There were included in the importation also some wooden stands, but as the importer waived the claim of free entry as to them, those articles present no question for our consideration.
The other articles named are claimed to be free of duty under paragraph 656 of the tariff act of 1913 as artistic antiquities produced more than one hundred years prior to the date of importation.
Paragraph. 656, after providing for free entry of certain works of art…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gump Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Kronfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- McBride v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BirdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Hinkle v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Richards v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- United States v. BirdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928