Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Bird

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1928No. 3055Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Smith, Judge:

I regret very much that I find myself unable to concur in the opinion of the majority.

A hand-woven fabric, invoiced as' a rug, imported at Buffalo, N. Y., was classified' by the collector of customs as a hand-woven oriental silk rug, and assessed for duty at 55 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1116 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:

1116. Oriental * * * and other carpets and rags not made on a power-driven loom * * * all the foregoing plain or figured, 55 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested that the merchandise was not a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. TsaiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API