United States v. Grote
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE GANT
LONNY R. SUKO, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 26, 2009, this court entered an “Order Denying Motion To Suppress” (Ct. Rec. 119). That order concluded the August 14, 2008 search of Defendant’s vehicle was a valid search incident to arrest under the law existing at the time. On April 21, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Arizona v. Gant, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009), relating to when a warrantless search incident to arrest is justified. Defendant asks this court to reconsider its “Order Denying Motion To Suppress” in light of Gant, and to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- United States v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. NottoliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.