Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2013PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*582OPINION OF THE COURT

Pigott, J.

Defendant was charged with various sex crimes pertaining to separate incidents involving two 12-year-old girls. At a bench trial, the People presented the testimony of an expert witness on the subject of child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome (CSAAS). We agree with defendant that the expert’s testimony was not adequately limited because certain hypothetical questions posed by the prosecutor improperly bolstered the People’s proof that defendant was the perpetrator. However, because the evidence of defendant’s guilt was otherwise overwhelming, we find the error…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. SpicolaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Noble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. The People v. Christopher A. NicholsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. DiazNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. MehmoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. GopaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. EnnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API