Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*680As the People correctly concede on this appeal, the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support the defendant’s convictions of sexual abuse in the second degree under counts 8 and 15 of the indictment. The People further correctly concede that two additional convictions of sexual abuse in the second degree must be reversed as multiplicitous (see People v Alonzo, 16 NY3d 267 [2011]). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s convictions for sexual abuse in the second degree under counts 8, 15, 16, and 17 of the indictment, vacate the sentences imposed thereon, and dismiss those…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. SpicolaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. AlonzoNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API