Legal Opinion

Davall v. Cordero

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 22, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01968Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH DAVALL, CDCR #AW-8294, Case No.: 20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC 12 Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 A. CORDERO; D. WHITE; WHITMAN, 15 Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 68, 71] 16 17 18 Plaintiff Joseph Davall (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights 20 under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to protect him 21 from an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API