Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Luceno v. Cuozzo

White Plains City Court

Decided December 20, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*872OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul H. Blaustein, J.

Madelyn and Vito Luceno (the Lúcenos) have filed a traffic information alleging that defendant Patrolman Cuozzo committed certain trafile offenses, and their attorney seeks leave of this court to act as prosecutor.

By way of background, an automobile accident occurred between Madelyn Luceno (herein Luceno) and Patrolman Cuozzo, and a traffic information was filed, charging her with the infraction of unsafely changing lanes. Her attorney appeared at the arraignment and, in addition to denying guilt, asked to allow this proceeding to continue against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Read v. SaccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. People v. Van SickleNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. People v. Wyner, New York County Courts1955
  4. People v. VlastoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
  5. People v. Citadel Management Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of NJ v. KinderDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  2. People v. CalderoneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
  3. People v. BirnbergCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1981
  4. People v. BenoitCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API