Legal Opinion

Sutherland Lumber Co. v. Due

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 14, 1973No. 46,916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This action involves the sufficiency of a subcontractors lien statement for materials furnished and used in the construction of a bam. The trial court sustained a defense motion to dismiss the action and the materialman has appealed.

In the course of this opinion we shall refer to the lien claimant, Sutherland Lumber Co., as plaintiff or Sutherland, and to the owners of the barn as defendants or the Dues.

The bam in controversy was built on land which the Dues were buying on contract from a couple by the name of Sutton. The prime contractors…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daly v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Seaton v. G. C. Hixon & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Atkinson v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. D. J. Fair Lumber Co. v. KarlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Ekstrom United Supply Co. v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holiday Development Co. v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. J. Walters Construction Co. v. Greystone South Partnership, L.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  3. Trane Co. v. BakkalapuloSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Boyce v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. In Re Birdview Satellite Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API