Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Knudson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1976No. 47,891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This action was initiated by a builder to foreclose a lien. Proceedings after trial of the foreclosure action involve motions for implementation of the judgment by lien creditors, who were never parties to the action, because of certain provisions in the judgment for their benefit. Appeal has been perfected by these non-party lien creditors from an order of the trial court refusing to give them favorable relief.

In June of 1971 Kenneth Boyce (plaintiff-appellee) contracted with Virgil and Eileen Knudson (defendants-appellees) to build two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Highland Lumber Co., Inc. v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Clark Lumber Co. v. PassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Adair v. Transcontinental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Deering-Milliken & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Modern-Aire of Hollywood, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Bell v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Highland Lumber Co., Inc. v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. In Re Birdview Satellite Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1988
  5. Confinement Specialists, Inc. v. SchlatterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API