Legal Opinion

Hamner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1943No. 10393PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Hamner’s motion .to quash counts one and two of the indictment was overruled; a jury was waived, and he and two others were convicted and sentenced to fine and penitentiary imprisonment for conspiracy and for seven substantive offenses which were also charged as overt acts done pursuant to the conspiracy. Hamner alone appeals.

The motion to quash was in reality a demurrer, which included in its grounds that count one charged no crime, and that in its allegations as to the purpose of the conspiracy it was too vague and indefinite; and that count two did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. Carl J. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. William Alfred Reno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. Barbara McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API