Legal Opinion

Consolidated Traction Co. v. South Orange & Maplewood Traction Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 1, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On bill, &c., and application for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

The complainant is a traction company operating street railways, organized under the Traction act of March 14th, 1893, and under this act entered upon and is operating the street railroad of the Orange and Newark Horse Car Railroad Company, as one of its lines. This street railroad is a double-track road running through Main street in the city of Orange, and, at the time of the entry on it by complainant, was operated by horses, but is now equipped and operated by the electric overhead trolley system.

The rights of the complainant to the occupation of the portion of Main street now…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. West Chicago Street RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Bridgeport Traction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Brooklyn Central & Jamaica Rail Road v. Brooklyn City Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Paterson & Newark Railroad v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MORRIS CTY. TSFR. v. Frank's SanitationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Altman v. New York City Health And Hospitals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. United Railroads v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API