Legal Opinion
Considine v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 21, 2015No. CASE NO. 3:14-cv-1601 (VAB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
Victor A. Bolden, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, Kerry Considine, has filed a Complaint against her employer, Brook-dale Senior Living, Inc. (“Brookdale”), alleging that it improperly denied her same-sex spouse health and dental insurance coverage. She claims that Brookdale’s actions violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d), and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (“CFEPA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. § 46a-60. Am. Compl. ¶¶33-43,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fernandez v. Mac Motors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Fontaine v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.District Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- LifeVoxel.AI Inc. v. MamillapalliDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024