Legal Opinion
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 2, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner moves to suspend respondent attorneys on the ground that they have failed to file a registration statement and pay the *375required attorney registration fee in accordance with Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 118.
The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration, and a notice sent by petitioner, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee.
Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.