In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
PerCuriam.
Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1975, was suspended by this Court’s order dated July 2, 2003 for failure to comply with the attorney registration require- ments of Judiciary Law § 468-a (307 AD2d 374 [2003]).
Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.
Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003