Jones v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in dismissing Count II of the amended complaint. We hold that Count II except for paragraph eight was properly pleaded and should not have been dismissed.
In McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure, 2d Ed., § 1134, we find:
At common law there were different forms of action ex delicto, and the plaintiff might in certain cases have a choice as between forms of action. If one entered upon the land of another and cut trees and carried them away, the owner might have several different remedies. He might sue in trespass q.c.f. for injury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Harrison v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Williams v. Elm City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Hilgreen v. . Cleaners Tailors Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Simmons v. WilderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- City of Sanford v. Dandy Signs, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Barnard v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Price v. North Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Snow v. NixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.