Legal Opinion
In re Children of Bethmarie R.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 12, 2018No. Docket: Ken–18–8PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHumphrey, J.
[¶ 1] Bethmarie R. appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court (Waterville, Stanfill, J. ) finding jeopardy to two of her children pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4035 (2017) and ordering the Department of Health and Human Services (the Department) to cease reunification efforts pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4041(2)(A-2) (2017). The mother contends that (1) the court erred when it concluded that the doctrine of res judicata did not bind the Department to orders issued by the Probate Court concluding that the children were not in jeopardy, and (2) her due process rights were violated. We affirm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rideout v. RiendeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- In Re Robert S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Beal v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Children of Kacee S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- In re Child of Lacy H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Pat Doe v. Christopher Hills-PettittSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- In re Child of Rebecca J.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- In re Children of Bethmarie R.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.