Legal Opinion

Cornwell v. Moss

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1917No. 20,575PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Butler district court; Allison T. Ayres, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by •

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action of replevin brought by W. H. Cornwell to recover some live stock taken by The Farmers and Merchants National Bank of El Dorado, under a chattel mortgage. This is the second trial of the cause, an appeal having been taken from the judgment on the first trial. (Cornwell v. Moss, 95 Kan. 229, 147 Pac. 824.) At the last trial the jury found the plaintiff to be the owner of an undivided half interest in the property, valuing his interest at $383.50, and assessed damages in the sum of $671.50 because the bank wrongfully…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Headley v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Cornwell v. MossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Yandle v. KingsburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Estes v. Edgar Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Krueger v. SchlemeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Sansone v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Gratney v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API