Legal Opinion
Bell v. Rossotti
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2002No. CIV.A. 1:CV-01-1725PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Before this Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment (Doc. No. 12). The motion has been fully briefed, and is ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted.
I. Background
On September 10, 2001, Plaintiff Thur-ston Bell, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against IRS Commissioner Charles Rossotti in his official capacity, and IRS agents Chris Roginsky and Kathleen Lennon in their official and individual capacities. In his suit, Bell seeks (1) a declaratory judgment that his websites and their…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomas More Law Center v. ObamaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Giles v. Volvo Trucks North AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- United States v. SchiffDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003
- ADAMES v. PISTRODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- DUBOSE v. FDC PHILA (WARDEN)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.