Legal Opinion

United States v. Francisco Valdes-Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2011No. 11-40392UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Javier Valdes-Rodriguez appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. He argues that his within-guidelines sentence is procedurally and substantively unreasonable.

In reviewing the sentence imposed for reasonableness, this court must first determine whether the district court committed any procedural errors, including, inter alia, “failing to adequately explain the chosen sentence.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). If the district court’s decision is procedurally sound, this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. CooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API