Herbert v. Forman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Waldo Herbert et al., defendants in the trial court, appeal from a decree quieting title claimed by plaintiff, Emil Forman, to the mineral rights in a described acre of land used and occupied by school district No. 87, Kingfisher county, Okla. The school district was not made a party to the action and only the. mineral interests in the land are involved.
*638Emil Forman relies upon a quitclaim deed obtained in 1944, purporting to grant to him the school district’s interest in the mineral rights. He limits the issue in his answer brief to the question of whether the school district, as result of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spillsbury v. School District No. 19Arizona Supreme Court · 1930
- School District No. 100 v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Caldwell v. ScivallySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Liles v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST NO. 40, NOWATA CTY. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968