Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 2008No. COA07-3Published

1DissentJackson, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. Although I agree that the interpretation of whether parole eligibility statutes are properly applied may be a question of law subject to the Declaratory Judgment Act, I would hold that the complaint in the instant case is properly a matter for a motion for appropriate relief, and that the trial court’s order was an impermissible collateral attack on plaintiff’s conviction. I also believe it is necessary to clarify the factual background of this case.

During a 24 June 1996 status review, a parole case analyst certified plaintiff’s parole…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. WoolridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Michigan National Bank v. HannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. StonestreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API