Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentJackson, Judge
I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. Although I agree that the interpretation of whether parole eligibility statutes are properly applied may be a question of law subject to the Declaratory Judgment Act, I would hold that the complaint in the instant case is properly a matter for a motion for appropriate relief, and that the trial court’s order was an impermissible collateral attack on plaintiff’s conviction. I also believe it is necessary to clarify the factual background of this case.
During a 24 June 1996 status review, a parole case analyst certified plaintiff’s parole…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WoolridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Michigan National Bank v. HannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. StonestreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.