Legal Opinion

Peterson v. David "Spud" Bishop Contractor, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1989No. 87-1091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a verdict in favor of David “Spud” Bishop and his corporation, David “Spud” Bishop Contractor, Inc., in the amount of $15,600 plus $2,025 in prejudgment interest. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In 1985, Dale Peterson contracted with Bishop (we shall speak of Bishop as if he were the only plaintiff) to renovate a house that he and his wife had recently purchased. The parties agree that the contract price was to be based on Bishop’s cost plus 15%. The original estimate provided by Bishop was $89,946, plus or minus $5,000. According to Dale Peterson,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Wilson v. Andalusia Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Turner v. RhodesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Womack v. Myrick Lumbert Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. R. L. Bains Builders, Inc. v. BiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Poarch v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte RushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Ex Parte RushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Poarch v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API