Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Rush
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 26, 1999No. 1980328Published
1Opinion of the Court
730 So.2d 1175 (1999)
Ex parte Steve RUSH and Kim Rush.
(In re Steve Rush v. Terminix International, Inc., et al.; and Kim Rush v. Terminix International, Inc., et al.).
1980328.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
March 26, 1999.
Richard W. Whittaker, Enterprise, for petitioners.
T. Julian Motes and Michael E. Gabel of Sirote & Permutt, P.C., Mobile; and William H. Filmore of Matthews & Filmore, Ozark, for respondents Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc., d/b/a Terminix Service; Terminix International, Inc.; Hal Stacey Worthington; and Michael E. Hobaugh.
HOUSTON, Justice.
Steve Rush and his wife Kim Rush…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Old Republic Ins. Co. v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Georgia Power Co. v. PartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.