Phillips v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
In March, 1955 the Philadelphia Electric Company applied to the Public Utility Commission for approval to acquire a right-of-way across appellants’ farm. To this application an answer was filed stating that the condemnation was contrary to public convenience and *627necessity. Twenty seven other property owners who were affected by the application were allowed to intervene. A hearing was held, testimony taken, and on November 2S, 1955, the commission made an order approving the application and issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity. This appeal followed.
Is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Ft. Wayne & Chicago Ry. v. PeetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Coplay Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Allegh. V. R. v. Pittsb. Junction R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Byers v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Lower Chichester Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stellwagon v. PyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Willits v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Charch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Hess v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.