Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1936No. 30,846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Devaney, Chief Justice.

Action to cancel note and to set aside mortgage given to secure it.

On March 25, 1931, one Lars Urdal ivas indebted to the defendant in the sum of $1,000. This indebtedness ivas of many years’ standing. On that day Urdal executed a new note, and plaintiff’s ward, Christine Birkeland, and one C. A. Thorpe signed as sureties thereon. In March, 1932, when the note which Christine Birkeland had signed as surety became due, defendant went to see her and told her that he would give her until the following Monday to settle the matter and give him security. On the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of PinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  2. Pickett v. PickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  3. McAllister v. RowlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Farmers' Union Elevator Co. v. Syndicate InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. I. L. Elwood Manufacturing Co. v. BetcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schultz v. OldenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Krueger v. ZochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Keller v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API