Gambino v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
HANDLER, J.
This case, together with Allstate Insurance Co. v. Skolny, 86 N.J. 112 (1981), decided today, presents difficult issues of statutory construction involving New Jersey’s personal injury protection (PIP) statute. The problem of ascertaining legislative intent in each case requires an assessment of the meaning of statutory phraseology in the light of the principles and policies which undergird the PIP statute. In this case the interpretative issue is posed in terms of whether the plaintiff-claimant, Joseph Gambino, was an “income producer,”…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Watt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Campbell Soup Co. v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Caviglia v. Royal Tours of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- New Jersey Coalition of Health Care Professionals, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Banking & InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Licensed Beverage Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- GEICO v. Mount Prospect Chiropractic Center PACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Thermographic Diagnostics, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.