Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Schrader

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2017No. 15-3855PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles D. Schrader violated the conditions of his supervised release. He appeals only the district court’s 1 refusal to redact the Supplemental Presentence Investigation Report (PSR). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The government sought to revoke Schrader’s supervised release for two reasons: (1) cocaine possession and (2) sexual assault. It later added (3) alcohol consumption. Before the hearing, the government announced it did not have and would not present evidence about allegations (1) and (2). Schrader presented evidence that the victim fabricated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simmons, Inc., a Corporation v. Pinkerton's, Inc., a Corporation and National Surety Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Michael Len OrchardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Emmanuel AsanteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Donnell HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Manuel GrimaldoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Manuel GrimaldoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API