Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Tennessee Dept. of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 14, 1994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

Petitioner/appellant James M. Bishop, pro se, is a prisoner in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction (Department). Petitioner is incarcerated at the Lake County Regional Correctional Facility.

Petitioner filed a petition seeking a declaratory order pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, Tennessee Code Annotated sections 4-5-223, 4-5-224, 4-5-322 and 4r-5-323. It is petitioner’s contention that the respondent/appellee miscalculated his sentence credits by increasing his parole eligibility date by 20% after the Department of Correction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Jefferson v. Pneumo Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  3. Wheeler v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davis v. Tennessee Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Hughley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United Steelworkers of America v. Tennessee Air Pollution Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Davis v. Dept. of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. Davis v. Dept. of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API