Legal Opinion

Cox v. Crosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 2006No. 1D05-3857PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REVIEW

WEBSTER, J.

By petition for writ of mandamus, Leo J. Cox argued in the Circuit Court for Leon County that a 1993 amendment to section 944.275, Florida Statutes, which precluded him from receiving basic gain time, was unconstitutional. If successful, Cox would have been entitled to more than five years of additional gain time. The petition was denied and Cox has appealed to this court.

The circuit court issued an order which found Cox to be indigent for the appeal in accordance with section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and imposed a lien on his inmate trust…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Cason v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Florida Parole Commission v. SpazianoSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Jackson v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Crosby v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Lopez v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. McNeil v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API