Legal Opinion
Crosby v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 2, 2007No. 1D06-2743PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
949 So.2d 1181 (2007)
Wilson CROSBY, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 1D06-2743.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 2, 2007.
Wilson Crosby, pro se, Petitioner.
Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the denial of a petition for writ of mandamus which challenged the Florida Parole Commission's decision to revoke his conditional release supervision. Review is sought pursuant to Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 703…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- McDonough v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Houck v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Crosby v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Harris v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Johnson v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Williams v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.