Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Barner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 18,664PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Riley district court; Sam Kimble, •judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In this action, begun May 7, 1912, the appellants, E. T. Arnold & Company, sought to recover damages in the sum of $5000 from appellees on an abstractor’s bond given by O. C. Barner, as principal, and M. R. Barner, W. A. Brown and F. E. Marsh, as sureties. In the petition the appellants alleged that Barner was engaged in the business of making abstracts of title to real estate, and as a condition precedent he gave a bond in the sum of $5000, dated March 29,1909, and approved on April 9,1909, with the above-named parties as sureties,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Russell & Co. v. Polk County Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Goldberg v. Sisseton Loan & Title Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Anderson v. SpriestersbachWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Economy Building & Loan Ass'n v. West Jersey Title, &c., Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  5. Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Silver Bow Abstract Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,491 Koch Industries, Inc. v. Irwin Lyon Vosko, and Arthur Young & Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. Commercial Bank v. Adams County Abstract Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API