Rothstein v. Orange Grove Center, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, J.
in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ„ joined.
We granted appeal to determine 1) whether the defendants are entitled to a new trial based upon their claim that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence from four different sources, and 2) whether the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim for consortium damages and, if so, the proper remedy for that error. We hold that the four evidentiary issues are without merit. The defendants therefore are not entitled to a new trial. We further hold,…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Otis v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Benton v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Hill v. City of GermantownTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Tennie Martin, et.al. v. Southern Railway Company, et.al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Anne Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Woo-Jun Ki v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Christian Yeubanks v. Methodist LeBonheurCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- In the Matter of L.A.J., III State of Tennessee, Department of Children's Services v. Larry Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.