Legal Opinion

Charles P. Boland Co. v. Emma Willard School

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1912Published

Motion by defendant for a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.

The defendant moves for a bill of particulars pf the plaintiff’s claims. In the amended complaint three causes of action are alleged: First, for a balance claimed to be due from the defendant under a building contract for the erection by the plaintiff of a school building, a residence hall and a gymnasium for the defendant; second, *19for extra work and materials on such buildings, and, third, for damages for alleged delays caused to the plaintiff in the prosecution of the work by the alleged defaults of the defendant and its architects and by other contractors with the defendant.

Much of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrill v. KazisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. HandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API