Legal Opinion

Washington State Hop Producers, Inc. v. Riel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1944No. 29168PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blake, J. —

The plaintiff is a co-operative marketing association organized pursuant to the provisions of the Laws of 1921, chapter 115, p. 357, as amended by Laws of 1931, chapter 16, p. 59 (Rem. Rev. Stat, §§ 2878-2909 [P. C. §§ 134-46— 134-77]). The defendants Eugene R. Riel and Malvina Riel are members of the association. Lucienne J. Knisley is their daughter.

In 1937, the Riels entered into a marketing agreement with the plaintiff, by which they agreed to deliver to, and market through the latter, “all hops produced, owned, controlled, or possessed by [them]” during the years 1938 to 1947,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bates v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In Re the Estate of BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Fisher v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. EganWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Peterson v. Badger State Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chatterton v. LukerIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  2. King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API